3. What gives More Freedom?

Ah yes the old debate on freedom. People are always going on about the freedom of the people or the right to not pay soap tax. At any rate the list of freedom fights goes on for quite a long time. So what is the deal?

Around the mid-1800s there was a change from the ideas of monarchy to government, it is a common known fact that it all started around the American Revolution and spread from there. By the mid-1800s the change was accepted, but what was not accepted was the definition of it. People from the start abused this and simply justified it by changing the meaning and then no one could go against it. You either believed in freedom or you did not.

The real definition was the government and that is dependent on the depravation of free will the cause of freedom.

The government then says you “deserve” the rights to this so called freedom and that leads us to the concept of a right.

A right is a thing that is treated like an entitlement or something that you deserve. Now who decides what person deserves? Is it a person that knows the man or woman that this right is given too? Or maybe a political system that “seems” to work? No of course not, it is the government that makes the choice. Why? Because there is a real right that needs to be done with. It is the right to feel the truth of life by digging into the body where there is a feeling of true.

This feeling of true just is, and it comes in the moment where you know what to do and can make the choice. This can be made in the government all the time but it is blocked by rights. You cannot do this because of the right to do this or the right to do that. Now the government gets rid of the true feeling or will not do it because it might affect their power and if you read the above then you know that any form of government cannot stand a threat to their power. So that is a right.

So then what does a right have to do with freedom? Simple in order for everything to be under control it needs to be broken up into bits so it can be more easily controlled. So when freedom is broken up it gets broken into rights.

The idea of freedom is the government because it has the definition of freedom and it has taken control of the idea of it by making sure that there is no way for people to talk about the idea without also talking about the government.

By the government gaining control it then has put fear into not freedom by over dependence on society. The idea of society is very different from real society; the real one is a person’s relation to another person. The fake one is cites, work, government and all that. So when something is talked about without freedom it is talked about without society and vice versa. Because government is considered part of society is safe from harm.

Now real freedom is totally different from all of this. True freedom really is to have nothing blocking you from within and when the last block is gone there is freedom.

So with that info on how different freedom and “freedom” are, and how mislead “freedom” is why you would spend any of your time debating about what gives more “freedom”

Numbers Being Accurate

Statistic is a funny word, it means a fact or piece of data from a study of a large quantity of numerical data. I want to break this down word by word so we can actually see whether using a statistic is worth the effort. For starters, this definition uses the word fact, but what makes it a fact? It must be proven and demonstrated to be real, however I do not see at all. People throw statistics around in the same way our language is, by putting it everywhere. Statistics are simply overused to the point that they contradict each other. For example, here is one that says 48 women are raped every hour in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and here is an article saying it is false. Even if it was true it is only the case for a certain amount of time, and another problem is that is how statistics are conducted.
 

As you can see here this is a link to how statistics are conducted.I think that they do not always work because of the situation the person conducting the test is in. So many things you perceive are dependent on your surrounding environment. If you are conducting a study on how many people go for walks when it is a rainy day then the results could be totally different if you do the same study on a sunny day. The problem with number based studies is that they are forced into place. Meaning that they cannot be accurate in any situation but the one that it was conducted in.

The problem is that it is not just statistics that are like this, it is also every system that we create. The way the world woks is dependent on a complex series of numbers and that is why statistics are conducted. You can get lost in your own logic if it is not to simple and to think these random numbers people make up work is insane.

We need an alternative of some kind, something that works on every level and not just in our perception. What I am talking about is simply not having things like statics in the first place. The reason why they are used is usually to sustain things that are also based on abstract things. For example, public opinion is something that is very abstract and is conducted by statistics. It is abstract because someones opinion is very complex, so if you take a million peoples thoughts and summarized it into something very small then it is simply out of touch with reality. The only reason why people need public opinion in the first place is because the person conducting it is dependent on it. Meaning you need to hear what others think for something like an election, which makes everything more binary and discrete.

So, what is the alternative? As usual it depends on the situation, I think that if you want to be a good writer you should not need to present you writing in such a way that you readers get lost in the sheer amount of your letters, the systems you use or the any statistic like thing. Your work should not be dependent anything but your own ability to express your thoughts. When you are writing a factual article then you should have more then a number of some kind to make your point. It is OK if you use it on the side but you will not catch me doing it.I think it is also good to to try and get rid of your number based lifestyle. Right now people live their life as little isolated parts of a big machine.

Now you know why there is not going to be any statistic based article that will be written up by me. Aside from that I would just like to emphasise the inportance of designing your own way of talking and writing, you never know when it will come in handy.


Thanks for reading,

-Me