Monday, 17 December 2012



Some worthless political topics


2. This VS That

So what do people think in a conversation? Is it that someone is saying something and that someone is saying another “thing”? Then you may be correct, but are the things that they are saying important?

Probably not.

Why? For a few reasons, One) there is a common idea that is you either agree or disagree on something and there is not alternative. This leads to the defence of “physiological thought drafts” and it gets deeper and deeper into make belief stuff that is from the bulwark of bad ideas. Like left and right wing views.

This happens all the time in debates, discussions and… but, because, well I think ect… style conversations. So where do these ideas come from? They are all from different kinds of influenced and reacting provoking conversations.

Now what is this bulwark of bad ideas? Simple someone gets them from whatever feels and sounds like a thought or theory that others say would be a right, left or whatever.

Now of course there could be a way of talking without all this. The way is digging deep into the real world were the answer is easy to find and there is no “what about this” and “what about that” there is just recognising it and being with it not as an idea but as a fact.

So what is so bad about this? In and of itself this arguing is pointless so why not let them go on their marry ways?

Because it is the people that do it are the problem. It is hard to go through this process without developing emotional attachment to it and from this emotion everything goes wrong. It leads to so much more horror and you can see this not only in the debate or whatever, but you can also see it in their real lives. In short people like this never master themselves they only have faint awareness if any of their world and what they are doing externally and internally.



So then let us be honest, how can you trust anyone that is like this? How? They are not even capable of the responsibility of having a brain of a body. So regardless of who they are the decisions made by them are never true so in the end they cannot make the any true one on their own.



 

Friday, 7 December 2012

Hello everyone! I am back to give a six part series on... Well your about to see. Every now and then I will post one of the parts when I have not in a wile and will not for a wile.



Some worthless political topics
  1. BUSSNESS VS GOVERNMENT.
Did you ever wonder why people go so mental over nothing? Well a good example of this is…
Whether we should let the corporations gain control of the land that is not rightfully their own, or let the government do it.

Let’s break this down. You have two people one is a group that is dependent of the destruction of the environment that surrounds us, and the other is a group of people that believe in “belief”, “change” and every ones favorite “democracy”, in short the second is too busy trying to stop their ideas from falling apart that they are incapable of doing anything.

So who should we give it to? Both these groups are dedicated to their own personal bubbles in so many ways and they will do anything to make sure that it does not pop.

If you are a worker in a company you are most likely to think that there is one important thing and that is profit. Why? Simple because you are in an environment that ensures that there cannot be another important thing. So if you are to have any choice on a place it would be based on consumption and with it there cannot be a true and great decision, on something that is profitable like “whether or not a forest should be logged”. Because there is a very profitable answer which is to get rid of it.

If you are someone that works in the government then you adhere to the thinking that you are in a system that provokes change even though you are in some monstrous “thing” that prevents it. So being a person in this situation you are most likely to do everything everyone wants you to do. Why?

Two reasons. 

One you are someone that blends to a large group mind that needs you to do whatever it says, now this is everywhere not just in politics but when you are someone in a situation that involves making a decision like weather a forest should be logged, then you unknowingly manipulate others and then they do the same to you. That system of others manipulating others is the group mind that you must adhere to, and in politics there is much more demand for fake change so it generates more of this system. Let us be serious. If you were to make a decision based on a bunch of manipulated people’s ideas then how could you make a good decision?

Two you are locked in place, the government is made up of a large number of rankings that go higher and higher up. If say you are in the middle the only way to work your way up to the top is to have pride that you are not lower and the have shame that you are not higher up. So what do you do? Simple do whatever the top says to get there, but the top does whatever maintains there power and big change is the unknown and that means that it might not keep them in control. So of course they wouldn't do anything huge.

So as you can see they are both the same because they both do the same thing. Block any thing that is not known and controllable.

So then why pick any when they are both so screwed up? Because you yourself are the necessary part of the system that maintains this and that means that you cannot question. Sorry.